Miss you, Daddy!

January 31st, 2010 by Andy 4 comments »



今天是收获的一天,买了很多礼物可以回来带给亲朋好友。酒店有一个司机叫David,讲话傻傻的,但总是笑,经常接送我上下班,今天又是他来为我服务。我问他周末怎么不休息,原来他打两份工,早上6点到晚上7点,周末也工作。我们聊到了孩子,他有两个男孩,一个女孩,最大的男孩14岁了,中间的7岁,最小的女儿才18个月。他说他离异了,但是要养孩子,也不是经常能够看到孩子们,他说不知道怎么过圣诞节,所以通常圣诞他也都会工作。

临别的时候,我多给了他一些小费,他很感谢!我说David,  life is not easy, but try your best and be happy!

回到房间,再次听到了这首容易让我脆弱的歌曲,突然很想念爸爸,很想给他买个礼物,很想可以为他做些什么,却只有泪,不止的流……

Miss you, Daddy!

Wal-Mart, Li & Fung Sign Sourcing Deal

January 30th, 2010 by Andy 3 comments »

I did learn a lot of business insights from Li & Fung and those excellent leaders,  it’s such a great and successful company with huge potential, no doubt.

Wal-Mart, Li & Fung Sign Sourcing Deal

Save Money, Shop Fung-Mart

Li & Fung Streamlines Acquisitions and Supply Base with IT

Gartner Magic Quadrant – UC

January 25th, 2010 by Andy 13 comments »

Source: Gartner (September 2009)

Market Overview

In 2009, UC products continued to mature, and the market continued to consolidate. This, coupled with enterprise budgets for UC products being delayed, led to intensified competition among vendors in this market. Additionally, many enterprises have existing strategic partnerships and investments with two or even three different UC vendors. Each vendor has at least one strength, for instance, in e-mail, telephony or networking, and each vendor seeks to expand its footprint within the enterprise. One vendor strategy is the extensive use of bundling to advance the portfolio footprint. Another strategy is increased use of discounting and other incentives in order to allow new products into accounts.

Meanwhile, enterprises struggle to define road maps and strategies for advancing functionality, controlling costs, and retaining control over their accounts. While leading vendors advance a “one vendor for everything” view, enterprises often prefer to retain valuable existing investments and to maintain control by having a balance of partners. A strategy for accomplishing this is described in “Developing an Enterprise Unified Communications Road Map” and “Applying the Vendor Influence Curve to Unified Communications.” “Market Share: Enterprise Unified Communications Infrastructure, Worldwide, 2008″ describes current vendor market shares.

While most solutions today support key standards such as Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), an important distinction is the extent to which they federate and integrate with third-party products. Some solutions are intended primarily to enhance and operate within their own specific environments, and while these solutions do work with third parties, their interoperation is often limited. Other products are clearly designed to interoperate in multiple environments, thus are more flexible. Currently, there is no one best approach, and no vendor offers everything an enterprise needs for communication. Companies must make decisions by evaluating the emerging options based on their own objectives and on how the options fit with the business’s longer-term strategies.

Enterprise adoption of UC continues to increase; however, adoption rates remain low. This slow adoption is the result of multiple technical and organizational issues, including:

  • Enterprises have large investments in communication infrastructures that must be preserved; this leads to a slower evolutionary approach, rather than to the faster revolutionary “rip and replace” approach.
  • Many applications and products are complex to deploy and may require organizational changes.
  • The business case frequently is based on a soft return on investment (ROI) or a strategic investment, such as productivity improvements, rather than on hard ROI, such as cost savings. As a result, in a conservative economy, deployments occur more slowly, perhaps as part of a broader technology update.

Gartner expects these barriers to be resolved slowly, and during the next several years UC will become an accepted part of enterprise communication road maps and investments. As UC technologies and products are deployed, the challenge will shift from technology issues to organizational and change management. 

Several vendors offer strong UC solutions but were not included in this Magic Quadrant, because the inclusion criteria require that vendors have strong on-premises solutions in at least three of the six key technology areas. In the area of conferencing, Polycom and Tandberg offer strong solutions in conferencing, but do not offer solutions in other technology areas. In the area of UM, Applied Voice & Speech Technologies (AVST) offers a best-of-breed UM solution. Finally, some venders, such as AT&T, were not included because to be included in this report the UC solutions must be available for deployment on the enterprise’s premises, rather than offered solely as a service. Gartner is preparing separate research on UCaaS that will be published later in the year.
Market Definition/Description

UC is a direct result of the convergence of communications and applications. Differing forms of communication have been developed, marketed and sold as separate individual applications. In some cases, they even had separate networks and devices. The convergence of all communications on IP networks and open-software platforms is enabling a new paradigm for UC, and is changing how individuals, groups and organizations communicate.

Gartner defines UC products (equipment, software and services) as those that facilitate the use of multiple enterprise communication methods. This can include control, management and integration of these methods. UC products integrate communication channels (media), networks and systems, as well as IT business applications and, in some cases, consumer applications and devices.

UC offers the ability to significantly improve how individuals, groups and companies interact and perform. These products may be made up of a stand-alone suite, or may be a portfolio of integrated applications and platforms spanning multiple vendors. In many cases, UC is deployed to extend and add functionality to existing communication investments.

UC products are used by people to facilitate personal communications and by enterprises to support workgroup and collaborative communications. Some UC products may extend UC outside company boundaries to enhance communications among organizations, to support interactions among large public communities or for personal communication. Additionally, UC is increasingly being integrated or offered with collaboration applications to form UC and collaboration (UCC).

It’s useful to divide UC into six broad communication product areas:

  • Voice and telephony: This area includes fixed, mobile and soft telephony, as well as the evolution of PBXs and IP-PBXs. This also includes live communications, such as video telephony.
  • Conferencing: This area includes separate voice, videoconferencing and Web conferencing capabilities, as well as converged unified conferencing capabilities.
  • Messaging: This area includes e-mail, which has become an indispensable business tool, voice mail and UM in various forms.
  • Presence and IM: These will play an increasingly central role in the next generation of communications. Presence services, in particular, are expanding to enable aggregation and publication of presence and location information from and to multiple sources. This enhanced functionality sometimes is called “rich presence.”
  • Clients: Unified clients enable access to multiple communication functions from a consistent interface. These may have different forms, including thick desktop clients, thin browser clients and mobile PDA clients, as well as specialized clients embedded within business applications.
  • Communication applications: This broad group of applications has directly integrated communication functions. Key application areas include consolidated administration tools, collaboration applications, contact center applications and notification applications. Eventually, other applications will be communication-enabled. When business applications are integrated with communication applications, Gartner calls these CEBP.

Read More from origin: Magic Quadrant for Unified Communications (Gartner)

IT Due Diligence

January 23rd, 2010 by Andy 3 comments »

Source:The art of technology due diligence

As a CIO, I’ve been on the acquiring side of more than 35 companies, and every acquisition was unique. But in every case, it was my responsibility to assess the technologies of the new companies and develop the transition strategies for each.

In a series of seven articles, I will outline the process, and explain the tools, I developed for conducting the technology due diligence and assimilation required in the acquisition environment.

In this first article, I’ll discuss the need for due diligence objectives and review the process I developed for acquisition, discovery, and transition of technology resources.

Acquisition objectives
Executing an effective due diligence and transition plan is somewhat of an art because each acquisition is unique. There are similarities, however, especially when acquiring companies that boast a similar business model. It is extremely important to approach each situation objectively and rely on the discovery experience and instinct to know where to look and when to dig deeper.

A company acquires another company for any number of reasons, from eliminating competition to product diversification. It is important to know what the acquisition goal is before starting due diligence efforts in order to determine if the acquired technology organization can support your company’s goals.

If the company’s goal is acquiring new technology, due diligence becomes critical for assessing the stability and validity of the acquired company’s technology capabilities.

With every acquisition, a company should have a set of objectives as well as assumptions that are pertinent to the new company. Those assumptions may deal with the state of the company’s client base, capabilities of its management team, or its growth expectations. Before due diligence, tech leaders need to understand all of these assumptions to fully prepare. Failure at this point likely means failure in the future.

» Read more: IT Due Diligence

Lost

January 19th, 2010 by Andy 2 comments »

Winter Chicago

你有迷失的时候吗?当你像车轮一样碾过你的人生,你真的清楚你的终点吗?你想要什么,我常常问自己,常常审视自己,却常常得到不同的答案。也许这样探寻的过程正是人生的精彩之处,生命终止的那一刻,每个人都会有自己的答案。

一直记得曾有一位国外的教授告诉我,不管做什么事情,思考这样两个问题: What you can learn from…….. What you can contribute to……….. 对照自己,很多时候自己对别人要的太多了,也要求太高了,而真正的持久的快乐和自我满足却来自于你能够贡献多少,能够为别人和这个世界带来多少价值。可以是一个帮助,可以是一份理解,可以是一个微笑,可以是一份祝福。

在那么多欲望交织的网里,我们需要一个方向,我们需要与自己的内心对话,去找到那条通往生命彼岸的路,在你迷失的时候,在你烦躁不安的时候,静静的坐下来,为这个世界创造一点欢乐,一点幸福。我还做不到那么自如,但我想我在路上。